April 14, 2005 01 h 01 min
April 14, 2005 24 min
May 12, 2005 52 min
February 4, 2005 01 h 18 min
October 17, 2007 49 min
June 27, 2007 01 h 12 min
July 11, 2007 48 min
September 12, 2007 01 h 07 min
September 19, 2007 01 h 13 min
September 26, 2007 01 h 00 min
October 3, 2007 01 h 12 min
October 10, 2007 01 h 10 min
October 24, 2007 50 min
November 21, 2007 57 min
0:00/0:00
Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies in humans have shown that transient nociceptive stimuli causing pain elicit responses in an extensive network of cortical structures. This network, often referred to as the “pain matrix”, has been assumed to specifically reflect nociceptive processing, and extensively used in the past 30 years to gain knowledge about the cortical mechanisms underlying nociception and pain perception in humans.
In the first part of this talk I will provide evidence that, in contrast with this dominant view, these brain responses are not specific for the perception of pain. These results indicate that it is incorrect to refer to these responses as originating from a “pain matrix”, and question the appropriateness of relying on them to infer that an individual is in pain, or to build models of where and how nociceptive input is processed in the human brain to generate painful percepts.
Instead, I will suggest that the largest part of these brain responses reflect a basic mechanism through which the individual detects, reorients attention and reacts to behaviourally-relevant sensory events, regardless of the sensory channel conveying this information.
In the second part of this talk I will provide evidence that these brain responses are sensitive to changes in the location of environmental threats with respect to the body, and are related to the execution of defensive movements aimed to protect the body from threats in the sensory environment.
I will finally show that the dependence of such responses on the position of threatening stimuli in space supports the existence of a part of space surrounding the body (a “defensive” peripersonal space, DPPS) representing a safety margin advantageous for survival.
References:
Hu L, Iannetti GD.
Painful issues in pain prediction. Trends in Neuroscience 2016; 39(4):212-20.
Bufacchi RJ, Iannetti GD. Gravitational cues modulate the shape of defensive peripersonal space. Current Biology, 2016; 26(21):1133-R1134..
Iannetti GD, Salomons TV, Moayedi M, Mouraux A, Davis KD.
Beyond metaphor: contrasting mechanisms of social and physical pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013; 17(8):371-8.
Liang M, Mouraux A, Hu L, Iannetti GD.
Primary Sensory Cortices Contain Distinguishable Spatial Patterns of Activity for Each Sense. Nature Communications, 2013; 4:1979. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2979
Zhang ZG, Hu L, Hung YS, Mouraux A, Iannetti GD.
Gamma-band oscillations in the primary somatosensory cortex--a direct and obligatory correlate of subjective pain intensity. Journal of Neuroscience 2012; 32(22):7429-38.
Giandomenico IANNETTI, professeur de neurosciences de l’University College Londonn invité par l’équipe EAC - STMS (Ircam-CNRS-Sorbonne université), présente :
"Avoiding injury: brain responses to sudden stimuli and defensive agency"
Abstract:
Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies in humans have shown that transient nociceptive stimuli causing pain elicit responses in an extensive network of cortical structures. This network, often referred to as the “pain matrix”, has been assumed to specifically reflect nociceptive processing, and extensively used in the past 30 years to gain knowledge about the cortical mechanisms underlying nociception and pain perception in humans.
In the first part of this talk I will provide evidence that, in contrast with this dominant view, these brain responses are not specific for the perception of pain. These results indicate that it is incorrect to refer to these responses as originating from a “pain matrix”, and question the appropriateness of relying on them to infer that an individual is in pain, or to build models of where and how nociceptive input is processed in the human brain to generate painful percepts.
Instead, I will suggest that the largest part of these brain responses reflect a basic mechanism through which the individual detects, reorients attention and reacts to behaviourally-relevant sensory events, regardless of the sensory channel conveying this information.
In the second part of this talk I will provide evidence that these brain responses are sensitive to changes in the location of environmental threats with respect to the body, and are related to the execution of defensive movements aimed to protect the body from threats in the sensory environment.
I will finally show that the dependence of such responses on the position of threatening stimuli in space supports the existence of a part of space surrounding the body (a “defensive” peripersonal space, DPPS) representing a safety margin advantageous for survival.
References:
Hu L, Iannetti GD.
Painful issues in pain prediction. Trends in Neuroscience 2016; 39(4):212-20.
Bufacchi RJ, Iannetti GD. Gravitational cues modulate the shape of defensive peripersonal space. Current Biology, 2016; 26(21):1133-R1134..
Iannetti GD, Salomons TV, Moayedi M, Mouraux A, Davis KD.
Beyond metaphor: contrasting mechanisms of social and physical pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013; 17(8):371-8.
Liang M, Mouraux A, Hu L, Iannetti GD.
Primary Sensory Cortices Contain Distinguishable Spatial Patterns of Activity for Each Sense. Nature Communications, 2013; 4:1979. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2979
Zhang ZG, Hu L, Hung YS, Mouraux A, Iannetti GD.
Gamma-band oscillations in the primary somatosensory cortex--a direct and obligatory correlate of subjective pain intensity. Journal of Neuroscience 2012; 32(22):7429-38.